Compare drivers · baseline vs improved · delta visualization

Two runs. Three deltas. One verdict.

Wave-45 Phase 6 Block C.3 close-out per the ApexIQ competitor deep-dive steal-list item #3. Demo fixtures use generic Driver A + Driver B labels per Lane K persona-decoupling rule; real driver-to-driver compare wires when the session-store endpoint deploys.

Driver A · baseline run

driver-a

avg speed (m/s): 62.40
risk score: 42.18
wheel slip (%): 7.30
COA flag: permitted (1)

Driver B · improved run

driver-b

avg speed (m/s): 62.95
risk score: 46.45
wheel slip (%): 7.52
COA flag: permitted (1)

Delta + verdict.

avg speed (m/s): +0.55
risk score: +4.27
wheel slip (%): +0.22

Faster but riskier. Tune for stability: the lap-time win comes from increased wheel-slip exposure on the load-transfer corners. Recommend stage-A Pacejka linearisation (Vinh M3-V12) before stacking another aggression delta.

Twin-driver coaching delta · same physical event · two persona archetypes

The storytelling killshot.

Same telemetry pattern (residual brake pressure 0.42 MPa + rising throttle 12 percent into turn 3). Different coaching action depending on what the driver's FIA Certificate of Adaptations actually says they are allowed to do. APEX reads the COA at the tensor level + the projector verdict changes. This is the operator-empathy delta in one card.

Driver A · adaptive driver (hand-control rig)

feasible

coa_overlap_flag1

Trail-brake in two micro-presses (4mm + 6mm on the secondary lever) into turn 3 while feathering throttle on the primary control.

Your FIA Certificate of Adaptations approves the brake + throttle simultaneity per the adaptive-equipment provisions of FIA Appendix L per the published revision. The same physical input that a validator hard-coding mutual-exclusion would flag as a violation is feasible here because the COA hardware-spec section permits the dual-lever pattern. The projector reads coa_overlap_flag = 1 + accepts the input.

Driver B · veteran archetype (standard controls, no adaptive COA)

violation

coa_overlap_flag0

Release brake fully before applying throttle into turn 3. Standard trail-brake technique with sequential pedal handoff.

Without an adaptive COA on file, the projector reads coa_overlap_flag = 0 + applies the default throttle * brake = 0 mutual-exclusion constraint. The same physical input pattern (residual brake pressure + rising throttle) flags as a brake-throttle simultaneity violation. Coaching prescribes the sequential pedal handoff the regulatory baseline requires.

Cross-ref: Sookra Methodology Pillar 3 (Storytelling) + Pillar 4 (Operator empathy) + wave-30 D-022 lexicographic COA constraint hierarchy + paper §3.4 COA-parameterized simultaneity gate + Lane K persona-decoupling (drivers stay anonymous archetypes; persona names live in storytelling layer only)

Cross-ref: ApexIQ competitor deep-dive (2026-05-25) steal-list item #3 + Lane K persona- decoupling rule + Sookra Methodology Pillar 1 (Product credibility). Back to /judges